The internationally recognized guide (JCGM 100) that establishes the framework and rules for evaluating and expressing measurement uncertainty.
The Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement, commonly known as the GUM, is the foundational document for uncertainty evaluation in metrology. Published by the Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology (JCGM), it provides a harmonized approach to quantifying measurement uncertainty that is accepted worldwide. The GUM replaced earlier methods that used terms like "error analysis" or "accuracy statements" with a more rigorous and consistent framework.
The GUM introduces the distinction between Type A evaluations (based on statistical analysis of observations) and Type B evaluations (based on other information such as specifications, calibration data, or scientific judgment). It describes how to model the measurement process, identify input quantities and their uncertainties, propagate uncertainties through the measurement model using partial derivatives (sensitivity coefficients), and express the result as an expanded uncertainty with a stated coverage factor.
For calibration professionals, the GUM is essential reading and the basis for all uncertainty analysis work. ISO 17025 requires that accredited laboratories follow GUM principles when evaluating measurement uncertainty. While the full mathematical treatment can be complex, the core concepts are accessible: identify what affects your measurement, quantify each effect, combine them properly, and state the result clearly. Supplement 1 to the GUM (JCGM 101) provides a Monte Carlo method as an alternative to the classical GUM approach for complex measurement models.
In aerospace calibration labs, GUM principles are critical when calibrating torque wrenches used for aircraft assembly. For example, when calibrating a 500 Nm torque wrench against a primary standard, metrologists must evaluate Type A uncertainties (statistical analysis of repeated measurements) and Type B uncertainties (calibration certificate data, environmental effects, resolution limits). The combined standard uncertainty calculation following GUM methodology might yield ±0.8 Nm at k=2, directly impacting flight safety documentation. Medical device manufacturers applying GUM when calibrating pressure transducers for ventilators must account for temperature coefficients, hysteresis, and reference standard uncertainties. A typical blood pressure monitor calibration might show expanded uncertainty of ±2 mmHg, critical for FDA compliance. Common audit findings occur when labs incorrectly combine uncertainty components, omit significant sources like drift or environmental effects, or fail to validate their uncertainty budgets through interlaboratory comparisons. For instance, neglecting to include the uncertainty contribution from a calibration standard's certificate can result in understated measurement uncertainty by 20-30%, leading to non-conforming product releases and potential regulatory violations.
ISO/IEC 17025:2017 extensively references GUM in sections 7.2.1.1 and 7.6.3, requiring laboratories to evaluate measurement uncertainty for calibrations and include it on certificates. AS9100D section 7.1.5.2 mandates measurement uncertainty evaluation aligned with GUM for aerospace applications. ISO 13485:2016 section 7.6 requires measurement uncertainty consideration for medical device testing. IATF 16949 references measurement system analysis incorporating GUM principles. ANSI/NCSL Z540.3-2006 section 10 specifically addresses GUM-based uncertainty evaluation requirements for calibration laboratories. ILAC-P14:01/2013 policy requires GUM compliance for uncertainty evaluation and expression on calibration certificates. Auditors specifically examine uncertainty budgets for completeness of Type A and Type B evaluations, proper statistical treatment of input quantities, correlation considerations, and validation through measurement audits. They verify that expanded uncertainties use appropriate coverage factors and confidence levels, typically k=2 for approximately 95% confidence. Non-compliance findings frequently involve incomplete uncertainty budgets, incorrect combination of uncertainty components, or failure to update uncertainty evaluations when measurement procedures change.
CalibrationOS implements GUM methodology through its integrated Uncertainty Calculator module, automatically evaluating both Type A and Type B uncertainty components for each calibration procedure. The system captures measurement repeatability data for Type A evaluation and incorporates reference standard uncertainties, environmental corrections, and instrument specifications for Type B analysis. The software performs Monte Carlo simulations when analytical GUM calculations become complex, particularly for non-linear measurement functions. Uncertainty budgets are automatically generated showing individual component contributions, sensitivity coefficients, and combined standard uncertainty calculations. CalibrationOS validates uncertainty evaluations through built-in statistical tools and generates GUM-compliant calibration certificates displaying expanded uncertainties with appropriate coverage factors. The audit trail feature documents all uncertainty evaluation decisions and assumptions, enabling laboratories to demonstrate GUM compliance during accreditation assessments. Real-time uncertainty propagation ensures that any changes to input quantities immediately update the overall measurement uncertainty, maintaining continuous compliance with JCGM 100 requirements.
The GUM (Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement) is the internationally accepted standard for evaluating and expressing measurement uncertainty. It provides the framework used by calibration laboratories worldwide.
Type A uncertainty is evaluated by statistical analysis of repeated measurements. Type B uncertainty is evaluated using other information such as manufacturer specifications, calibration certificates, or engineering judgment.
This article is licensed CC BY-SA 4.0. Share, adapt, and reuse with attribution to calibrationos.com/glossary/gum.
Industry benchmarks, best practices, and calibration tips — delivered to your inbox.
GUM-compliant expanded uncertainty with Welch-Satterthwaite degrees of freedom. No signup required.
Open the Calculator